Subject: Any reason we can't go back to the other Board now? (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2008-09-03 22:49:00 UTC
-
Any reason we can't go back to the other Board now? (nm) by
on 2008-09-03 22:49:00 UTC
-
Just my two cents. by
on 2008-09-04 08:31:00 UTC
Reply
I think everyone has good reasons for both staying here and returning to the old place. I think most of the older oldbies and lurkers and whatnot know the old place better than this one. A lot of the old sites link to that board, too, which means that anyone who wants to find this place has to go through a big long stumbling mess. I also have to admit I've never seen this place blue- a rather pathetic point, I know.
On the other hand, the newer and/or more active Boarders know this place a bit better, and most of our links lead here now, as has already been mentioned. Though I suppose it would be easy enough to change them back, and just have this place as the little party ground. Would definitely have made life easier on the old Board back during the Water Fight.
Maybe we'd be better off with July's suggestion. Let's go home and keep this place for overspill. -
When you put it that way... by
on 2008-09-04 12:07:00 UTC
Reply
Makes sense. Does the old one have some sort of moderators/admin now then, in case the spambot returns?
-
I believe... by
on 2008-09-04 12:34:00 UTC
Reply
Techno-Dann currently holds that responsibility, though don't tell the spambot.
I recall us holding some kind of vote over on there once the attack was over, though there was never any formal result announced. I think the general consensus was that Techno-Dann should hold admin powers until he retires or decides he doesn't want to admin any more. -
Aaah. Cheers; I couldn't remember : ) (nm) by
on 2008-09-05 02:13:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'd prefer to stick to the other Board as well. by
on 2008-09-04 02:41:00 UTC
Reply
At least as a main board.
And save this one for like uber event things that usually bury stuff and stretch the page wide like whoa.
Most everything links there, anyhow. -
are we voting? by
on 2008-09-04 02:07:00 UTC
Reply
I vote ... er ...
Well, the links on the Wiki all go here now. So I vote here I guess. -
I'm quite happy here, but I think some choice should be made by
on 2008-09-04 00:11:00 UTC
Reply
It's a tad annoying to go to both every day. One or the other - I don't mind which.
-
Agreed. And, well, this one's most popular now, I think. (nm) by
on 2008-09-04 00:12:00 UTC
Reply
-
Why go back? by
on 2008-09-03 23:17:00 UTC
Reply
But I like this one. It's......blue
-
Blue? It looks pretty darn red to me... (nm) by
on 2008-09-05 02:59:00 UTC
Reply
-
BLUE by
on 2008-09-05 18:33:00 UTC
Reply
I'm using firefox and for me its seems pretty darn BLUE
-
That would explain it. Does anyone have urple? (nm) by
on 2008-09-05 22:56:00 UTC
Reply
-
Yes. by
on 2008-09-06 01:08:00 UTC
Reply
Urple and wilver (or as close to it as I can get on Firefox), on a black background. The effect is rather horrifying.
Isn't FireFox wonderful? -
Horrendously terrifying. And undeniably OFUM-inspired. (nm) by
on 2008-09-06 01:13:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Horrendously terrifying. And undeniably OFUM-inspired. by
on 2008-09-06 01:19:00 UTC
Reply
There's also a lighter shade that could qualify as urple
My eyes hurt now. -
And now for something completely different! by
on 2008-09-07 00:54:00 UTC
Reply
I just bought a pen that has pink, urple, and purple ink thingys (it's the kind with a lot of different colors in one pen, pushed by springs and other...stuff). But they really don't have much of a distinction between the three so now I have three shades of urple-y magenta. Flattering.
-
Actually, that doesn't look too bad. by
on 2008-09-06 04:43:00 UTC
Reply
Mind you, it's probably due to the black being dominant...
-
I now must pity you, Ansela. by
on 2008-09-06 01:23:00 UTC
Reply
My eyes hurt, too. And that's just because I'm looking at your link thingy.
The color for used links really does look like a diluted form of wilver. And the semi-urple is making me see things now.