Subject: I'm a bad Beethoven fan...
Author:
Posted on: 2008-08-18 12:08:00 UTC
Why is the Third Concerto so very bad?
-
It's BACK. The spambot's BACK! (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 08:01:00 UTC
Reply
-
GAHFLAVINIOH:SDVUO:HSDVNJ:ADOHN! by
on 2008-08-19 08:34:00 UTC
Reply
My anger at this thing knows no bounds.
-
On the bright side by
on 2008-08-18 23:12:00 UTC
Reply
DoSAT can cannibalize all the spambots for spare parts.
-
*brightens up* That'll work! by
on 2008-08-19 02:10:00 UTC
Reply
Then maybe we can get enough CADs to go around again... of course, they might be somewhat prone to spamming us while on missions...
-
*swears repeatedly and kicks spambot* by
on 2008-08-18 10:06:00 UTC
Reply
Just **** off, will you?!
-
Maybe we're being deliberatly targeted? by
on 2008-08-18 08:43:00 UTC
Reply
It's a theory. If we are, I wish a frostbite for their evil little fingers, Legendary Badfic for their mind and a plague of fangirls.
I vote we also send a copy of Beethoven's Third Concerto, PPC edition. -
Wait... by
on 2008-08-18 18:45:00 UTC
Reply
...fangirls is a plague?
-
Ayup. by
on 2008-08-19 00:27:00 UTC
Reply
But it was just too cruel to unleash upon the people of Egypt, no matter how stupid their pharoah was being.
has been on Prince of Egypt kick lately :P -
It is now! (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 21:21:00 UTC
Reply
-
I'm a bad Beethoven fan... by
on 2008-08-18 12:08:00 UTC
Reply
Why is the Third Concerto so very bad?
-
I think it's more the involvement of by
on 2008-08-18 12:59:00 UTC
Reply
the PPC orchestra that makes it bad, rather than the actual music.
(Ansela volunteers her bagpipes, if they would add to the effect.) -
Better be... by
on 2008-08-18 13:59:00 UTC
Reply
the C minor piano concerto be awesome... Better than the G major, IMHO, but not up to the standard of either the violin or Emperor concerti.
/music geekery -
Well, I WAS implying what Ansela said... by
on 2008-08-18 14:17:00 UTC
Reply
But.. Nah, that's about it. I'm not overly knowledgable with music, so I don't really have anything against that piece.
-
It's definitely suspicious. by
on 2008-08-18 08:51:00 UTC
Reply
And there's something up with the names it's giving, too suspicious stare
-
Who would want to spam us? by
on 2008-08-18 09:04:00 UTC
Reply
I mean, what's the point? If someone's upset at being PPCd, you'd think their first reaction would be an angry rant, and THEN spamming when they realise we aren't going to be hurt by it. But there hasn't been anyone.
It's not as though we're going to be urged into an apology; the only result is that we might move elsewhere (ie, here). So what?
Unless they're doing it just for kicks, of course. Can't understand that sort of person... sigh
But I'm suspicious, too. -
The Forget-Me-Not or the Venomous Tentacula, perhaps? (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 17:00:00 UTC
Reply
-
*grin* by
on 2008-08-18 08:53:00 UTC
Reply
I still can't get over the first message...
"hi guys i am young boy like you i have free candy and yummies at my house pls come and get free candy like haloooweenie and you wil be very happy go to red van by house with scratching FREE CANDY and eat candy and have yummy yummy feeling then sleep at my house and lets HAVE FUNNY FUN and CANDY pls come i am young boy lonely 11 male lonely"
I laughed uncontrollably for a few minutes. SO, so funny. -
The machines have developed a sense of humor! Hide! (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 21:44:00 UTC
Reply
-
Recorded by the PPC Chamber Orchestra, no less! by
on 2008-08-18 08:44:00 UTC
Reply
I think you may be right, though. sigh
Stupid, stupid, stupid. -
*is pissed off to the nth degree* by
on 2008-08-18 08:10:00 UTC
Reply
Seriously...too many spambots and not enough egg whisks. I wish they'd just leave us alone, as pathetic as that sounds.
-
I know. by
on 2008-08-19 21:02:00 UTC
Reply
Stupid spambots...they could at least wait until we get more eggwhisks, huh?
-
I noticed by
on 2008-08-18 08:06:00 UTC
Reply
Voting for a permanent move here, if it can't be stopped.
...ing spamwraiths. Srsly.
-Trojie the Exasperated -
Yeah. by
on 2008-08-19 04:40:00 UTC
Reply
Mainly because it'll probably stop for half a day or a day or two, then come again. I vote we just go here. le sigh
-
But what if they are watching the wiki's list of changes by
on 2008-08-18 11:01:00 UTC
Reply
And They come here to spam?
What do we do then?
Fichunter, resident expert on trolls and 4chan memes. -
You watch 4chan? by
on 2008-08-18 19:53:00 UTC
Reply
Dude, how do you survive? When I went there for the first and only time, I was nearly blinded. Your eyes must be a helluva lot stronger than mine. :P
Then again, I may be jumping to conclusions. Just 'cuz you're an expert on 4chan memes, doesn't mean you watch it. I appear to be an expert on a load of stuff because I memorise Wikipedia periodically. :D -
Re: You watch 4chan? by
on 2008-08-18 21:47:00 UTC
Reply
Hey, we're not that bad. /b/ isn't the whole of 4chan.
I like the cooking, animals, and paranormal boards, though, so I may be biased. There's only so many horrible things you can do to lentils. -
I loathe the people there, but the Holders rocked. by
on 2008-08-20 01:42:00 UTC
Reply
Speaking of which, would it count as Sueism if my agents were to accidentally pick up an Object in the course of an execution, when they realise the only way to safely get away from the Holder is to pass its test? The entire series is in second-person, so technically there is no canon Seeker whose canon life-story could be damaged, but they damn sure wouldn't be looking for the rest of the things - they'd have to portal back into the Holders canon and find an actual Seeker to pawn it off onto. But the things can't just be handed over, they have to be "won", so they'd also have fun thinking up some ridiculously humiliating and hysterically funny thing the Seeker would have to do to get it ...
-
Not a fan of the Holders, but by
on 2008-08-20 15:50:00 UTC
Reply
I rather like that idea. A new story to break up the Holders series would be nice, too-- my main issue with the Holders is that there are way too many and they ended up being much of the same, so I am in favor of an actual story for one of them.
Be ruthless in figuring out what troubles the Seeker should overcome/tape the outcome and hold a screening for other agents?
P.S. if you liked the Holders, check out the SCP series? Paranormal objects and government coverup, hooray! -
Would be another chance for Skyfire to lecture them. by
on 2008-08-20 19:58:00 UTC
Reply
"What's in that box?"
"What box?"
"The one you're hiding behind your back." sniff "Why can I smell ultimate evil?"
"You can smell that?"
"I did work for a Lead Villain, you know."
Wonder what a couple of bored teenage girls would make someone do to win an object of ultimate evil power which they didn't want anymore ... maybe they could just sell it on Ebay? Going through the stupid bidding war is enough of a trial.
Which Object do you think they should use? Holder of the End is well-known because it's the first one, fairly simple to defeat and still kills you in an unpleasant manner if you screw it up, which a /b/tard troll undoubtedly would because they only pay attention to the Yiff In Hell thing. -
"Instead of ultimate evil, box contained crayon drawing." by
on 2008-08-20 20:43:00 UTC
Reply
Would not buy again.
-
Oh, and if Nevada-tan wasn't a real person ... by
on 2008-08-20 20:07:00 UTC
Reply
... and it therefore wasn't sick and weird to glorify a seriously disturbed kid, we could mention her. The intarnetz seem to have fictionalised her to a reasonable degree, though ...
-
^ Was me, incognito! Or I forgot to put a name. Whatever. (nm) by
on 2008-08-20 15:54:00 UTC
Reply
-
Sorry about that. by
on 2008-08-19 11:31:00 UTC
Reply
I assumed the 4chan livejournal page (i.e. 4chan(dot)livejournal(dot)com) was the extent of it all. I didn't realise there was more to it. is an intarnetz noob
-
Re: Sorry about that. by
on 2008-08-19 17:40:00 UTC
Reply
No worries; I didn't know about the livejournal account. Hooray team Internet Ignorant Bliss!
Clearly you are my put through the looking-glass and we need to go on an adventure to solve this problem. ;) -
Adventures are fun. by
on 2008-08-19 21:00:00 UTC
Reply
So I look at your 4chan boards and you try to avoid the LJ? ;)
-
Whee, exploring! by
on 2008-08-20 15:53:00 UTC
Reply
Psh, and let you have all the fun?
I'll just grab my bucket-on-a-stick, then it's off to explore a new medium for horrible people to fight on. -
They can be banned here, by
on 2008-08-18 11:06:00 UTC
Reply
Repeatedly, if need be.
Also, so far the bot seems to have only been set at attacking the main Board. -
*throws in her vote with Trojie* (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 10:46:00 UTC
Reply
-
Seconded. I haven't checked the IPs, but by
on 2008-08-18 08:12:00 UTC
Reply
it could be the same source - don't know.
Bleh. head-desk -
Coming from GoDaddy this time. by
on 2008-08-18 08:21:00 UTC
Reply
So it's decidedly malicious.
-
Updated the Wiki about it, by the way. by
on 2008-08-18 08:26:00 UTC
Reply
Hope you don't mind. DX
-
No way, it's all brill when others update it. (nm) by
on 2008-08-18 08:29:00 UTC
Reply